|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
TOP STORIESGUEST COMMENT: Techniques for the new infinite interview process4 November 2009By Anonymous COMMENTSsweetheart, the days of easy money are really over. Everyone these days is pitching their little heart out. Read all comments »As someone who’s attempting to launch herself back into the City after a year on the periphery, at this point it seems to me that the main change wrought by the financial crisis is on the interview process.
No longer is it enough to expect two interviews to do the trick: interview one with the hiring manager; interview two with the hiring manager’s boss (and, in the old days, interview two was often skipped because the big boss couldn’t really be bothered to get involved so low down the food chain – interestingly, this continued to be true no matter how senior you got which explains how a lot of people ended up on various boards). These days, it appears that everyone needs to be involved.
As a result, the skills required for the successful completion of the interview cycle have changed.
First of all, you need to be expert at Name Drop Bingo. This is where, by mentioning names of people you have worked with or for in the past, both interviewer and interviewee get a better idea of you really are.
It’s a more difficult game than it appears at first glance. In early rounds you have to mention names carefully, in an entirely neutral tone, neither approving nor disapproving, hopefully provoking a response from across the table that will let you know where you stand and whether you should wax lyrical or pretend that “actually, you weren’t that close, and anyway he worked on another desk”.
This technique can be equally useful when picking an employer: there is nothing better when it comes to foretelling your new working conditions than listening to your future boss praising someone who you know should only be allowed out of his house on a choke chain.
Get past interview bingo, and you’ll be playing spot the cliché as you’re asked a variety of standard interview questions. It’s important to take these seriously and, for example, to answer the question “What would you bring to the role?” using phrases such as, “huge P&L,” “loyal client base,” “ambition and experience,” rather than, “My own shoes”. Equally, when asked what motivates you, try not to say “My salary” or, even worse, “I need a warm place to go during the day so I don’t have to have the heating on at home”. As you will, apparently, be forced to go to many interviews, you will have plenty of chance to perfect your responses.
I’m currently waiting for a date to be set for my fifth interview with the seventh and eighth individuals involved at a particular bank and therefore have my script down pat. There has been mention of video conferences and, at this point, I really wouldn’t be surprised to be asked to come back in to meet the Canteen Manager or the Head of the Security Team, except, of course, that they may be too busy running the business while everyone else is stuck playing bingo.
COMMENTSkaratekid, Asset Management, Wed 04 Nov 09sweetheart,
Pooky, Capital Markets, Wed 04 Nov 09Ah Goldmans, if an interview is worth doing once its worth doing 5 times. Add your comment »Mr. Frank White, Quantitative Analytics, Wed 04 Nov 09Interview Tips from someone who is unemployed? Ironic! Add your comment »cja105, Wed 04 Nov 09Perhaps you should set your sights on the post room, a bit more realistic in the current climate. Add your comment »A recruiter, HR & Recruitment, Wed 04 Nov 09Look, clearly the problem here is you. I for one am getting bored of reading your articles. Clearly you think you are bit of a dry wit. My thoughts having read this and your previous publication is that you are quite precious, a bit lazy and very very full of your own self worth.
swapper, Debt / Fixed Income, Wed 04 Nov 09Been through similar myself lately. In 6 times, with about 15 people, (including one 7hr marathon - I nearly passed out), video conferences, global head of this and that. Couldn't think of who else I could meet - wife assumed I had the job but I wasn't so sure - I remembered a previous headhunting episode where I had even more interviews (including trips to NY and TOK) and it didn't happen. Sure enough, no joy. I've been on the other side of this in the past and agree whilst some jobs have significant interaction with other functional areas and geographies it's not absolutely necessary to meet and be approved by them all. It strikes me as a blame-sharing insurance by line managers. Add your comment »jase, Hedge Funds, Thu 05 Nov 09"It strikes me as a blame-sharing insurance by line managers."
FXTrader, Trading, Thu 05 Nov 09I thought that article was quit funny, although probably not very useful. Add your comment »dd, Commodities, Thu 05 Nov 09@A Recruiter: actually, she comes across a little too rational for The City's petty social/political games. Whereas you, you come across as part of the problem. Add your comment »..., Asset Management, Thu 05 Nov 09As with many articles, reactions to this seem to demonstrate that the world falls into two camps - those who are unfortunate enough to be looking for a job and those who are lucky enough to have been in a secure seat when the music stopped. The latter delight in beating up the former and pushing the view that they are deficient - I just hope that those of you who have sat in their seats for the last 12 months and are now recieving remuneration rises will one day go through the living hell that job searching over the last 12 months has been - and those of us who were on the receiving end of all your criticism and 'advice' will remember and mete out the same treatment ..
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||