|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
TOP STORIESHow long before banks go back to hiring experienced juniors?22 June 2009By Sarah Butcher COMMENTSWill be awesome in a couple of years when there's huge demand for VPs and not many people.. :-D Read all comments »Banks are recruiting senior staff and taking on university leavers and MBAs, but the hiring action around experienced analysts and associates remains negligible. And despite claims that M&A is picking up, recruiters say there’s absolutely no indication when hiring at this level will resume. This is partly because recruiters don’t know what’s going on: there are so many people on the market that banks are able to hire directly. It’s also because it takes a big pick-up in activity to drive recruitment of experienced juniors: it can be easier to reallocate people internally.
“Most places have enough people to support the deals that they’ve got, and enough slack to support a small increase in any extra deals that come in. If there is a step change in flow then the case for revisiting their junior resource needs will have to be revisited” says Jim Nairn at recruitment firm The Cornell Partnership.
“Banks are only going to hire at this level when activity picks up significantly,” says the head of HR at one European bank in the City. “It will be next year before we’re likely to need any experienced analysts or associates.”
The head of recruitment at one major US bank says junior hiring tends to be driven mostly by poaching. He also says that it lags mid-ranking and senior hiring by a few months, implying that it will happen in the near future. “The surge of refinancing coming out of the credit crunch means that our capital markets business is now firing on all cylinders and we’re focusing recruitment at the mid-ranking and senior level.” In the meantime, the head of HR says redundant analysts and associates should make the most of their time off: “You should be studying, travelling, and living somewhere very cheap.”
COMMENTSalexbouditsk, Mon 22 Jun 09kolabrou, LSE and Imperial got just one advantage - they're located in London. So for banks it's much easier to get there. The quality of teaching is much worse than at other top UK Uni such as Oxbridge, Warwick, Durham, St Andrews, Bristol, UCL, York
LSE&PS, Student, Tue 23 Jun 09I'm studying Economics & Maths @LSE and can tell you that AG is talking out of his/her backside. There aren't that many people on the course and hardly anyone has an offer - certainly not in banking. The biggest groups seem to be civil service and people continuing to MSc programmes. Add your comment »John, Student, Tue 23 Jun 09AG, with regards to your previous post: I went to warwick and did an internship at a top IB, less than 20% of its interns received job offers for 09 and graduate recruitment was frozen. As far as I know this was the case for most IBs Add your comment »AG, Student, Tue 23 Jun 09John and LSE&PS, like I said it depends on the people you associate with within a degree course. Obviously there's a lot of dead weight amongst any broad group but I'm in an inner circle of people who successfully converted their internships - we all aided each other with insider knowledge exactly how to successfully convert.. so no failures here. However that 20% statistic is definitely not the same across all banks, where I'm heading to they gave 80% of us offers (having had a massively shrunk 08 interns class in the first place).
Argument, Derivatives, Tue 23 Jun 09The easy way to distinguish a top candidate with an average one is to ask about the number of publications they have. You would be surprised to find candidates from the rock bottom of british universities publishing in top stohastic analysis journals. On the other hand, I knew someone from Oxford, who failed the FSA exams. What do you say to that? Add your comment »Micheal, Investment Banking / M & A, Tue 23 Jun 09God, reading this makes me sick, so much BS you could fertilize 50 fields. AG seems to be the biggest BS producer, when he actually starts work he will have a shock, he will be working with inferior university graduates such as myself, who in many cases will be his boss. If you have that attitude in my team you will be an expert in tea and coffee making by the end of your rotation if you dont get the boot. Typical arrogant and immature attitude from someone born with a silver spoon. I can tell you as a hirer and firer that there are not many jobs about for entry level/grad roles, you dont need to go to LSE to realise that. Add your comment »Argument, Debt / Fixed Income, Tue 23 Jun 09Micheal: When you said BS, did you mean Black Scholes? lol.
AG, Student, Tue 23 Jun 09"someone born with a silver spoon"
Flabbergast, Global Custody, Tue 23 Jun 09The only immature, pathetic people in this entire thread are those who actually seem to believe that people who went to Oxbridge/LSE must be rich and went to a private school. Staggering levels of ignorance. The majority of LSE students, and 45% of Oxbridge, went to free schools actually. Add your comment » |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||