|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
TOP STORIESMI5 wants some quants12 June 2009By Sarah Butcher and Paul Clarke COMMENTSAlso, to tell the truth, the Fleet Street building is a bit of a dump. The Boots next door is more impressive Read all comments »The secret intelligence service, MI6, might be actively targeting bankers for ‘operational officers’ (AKA ‘spies’), but it seems MI5 is also keen to hear from City applicants.
The difference, as you’re no doubt aware, is that MI6 deals with international issues (hence Bond’s adventures in exotic locales), whereas MI5 looks after intelligence issues on home soil.
It’s currently recruiting for its annual intake of ‘intelligence analysts.’ Being an intelligence analyst is less exciting than being a spy, but it does seem well suited to people with an aptitude for mathematics.
As spokesperson for MI5 was reluctant to elaborate on their precise requirements, but according to the advert, they’re looking for people who, ‘bring experience of working with analytical and/or statistical packages and large electronic and hard copy data sets.’
According to one recruiter, this equates to quants, although not necessarily high-powered ones. “MI5 don’t do much of the signal analysis work themselves. The more interesting quant roles are at GCHQ in Cheltenham,” he says.
One stumbling block is the pay. Recruiters say GCHQ pay badly, and MI5 is offering £24-30k. After undertaking the notoriously gruelling interview and assessment process, you’ll therefore be paid no more than your average civil servant.
Successful candidates will need to be able to get by on this amount. As an article in the FT recently suggested, financial services professionals are not always considered suitable for roles in the intelligence services as their high-spending ways make them more prone to being bribed.
COMMENTSMr Magoo, Equities, Fri 12 Jun 09...and as they've managed to destroy the Western financial system and cause misery for millions, Osama BL encourages all suitably qualified candidates to apply ASAP.... (especially the AIG and Lehman ones) Add your comment »Harry, Research, Fri 12 Jun 09all these " is x the new goldmans" is getting tired, its not funny now and was marginally funny the first 50 times. Add your comment »Dr No, Equities, Fri 12 Jun 09Harry-The problem is the bankers on here are so one dimensional they find this 'joke' funny and so just keep repeating it as they cant think of anything else Add your comment »michael, Debt / Fixed Income, Fri 12 Jun 09can somebody explain to me this "is xxx the new goldman sachs" joke, now that its over and no longer funny maybe someone can explain in simple terms for simple people like me Add your comment »GS, Investment Consulting, Sat 13 Jun 09Is being tired of formulaic jokes the new Goldman Sachs? Add your comment »ponterotto, Derivatives, Sat 13 Jun 09the big joke about Goldman Sachs is that below MD you earn much less than you would at so called "lesser" banks and work 10 times as harder in general.
tom fyson, Accounting & Finance, Sun 14 Jun 09I thought MI5 already were already a bunch of quants? Add your comment » |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||